NSL DRC Faces Scrutiny Over Delays in Baartman and Velebayi Verdicts

The NSL’s Dispute Resolution Chamber (DRC) is under growing pressure due to delays in ruling on two key transfer cases involving Luke Baartman and Asanele Velebayi.

Baartman’s case was heard on July 21. Velebayi’s followed on Monday. But no verdict has been issued in either matter. The silence is raising questions about fairness, efficiency, and transparency in the National Soccer League’s dispute process.

Kaizer Chiefs are trying to sign both players as free agents after Cape Town Spurs were relegated to the ABC Motsepe League. Spurs argue that the players are still under contract and that relegation does not cancel existing agreements. The DRC must decide who is right.

The delay in Baartman’s ruling, now over two weeks, is frustrating for all involved. It could also create confusion if Velebayi’s case is resolved faster or with a different outcome. Each case is reviewed by a separate three-member panel, a move designed to ensure independence. But with both disputes hinging on the same rule — NSL Rule 4.3.1.4 — inconsistent outcomes could damage the DRC’s credibility.

Rule 4.3.1.4 allows players to apply for free-agent status if their club loses professional status. However, interpretations of this rule may differ between panels. That risk grows if the DRC does not coordinate how similar cases are judged.

These delays hurt more than just public perception. Chiefs need clarity to finalise their squad before the Betway Premiership kicks off on Saturday. Spurs must also prepare, whether by keeping their players or selling them. Rival clubs are watching closely, hoping to pounce if either player becomes available.

The lack of updates from the DRC fuels suspicion. Many now question whether internal issues or external pressure are slowing the process. The danger is clear: if verdicts come at different times or contradict each other, fans and clubs may suspect bias.

Any ruling can still be appealed, which could push final decisions even further out. That means longer periods of uncertainty for Baartman and Velebayi, which could stall their careers.

The NSL must act. It needs to deliver both rulings quickly. It must explain any delays and align the decisions with clear legal reasoning. Consistency is key. If the outcomes differ without justification, trust in the DRC will fall.

Delays breed doubt. The NSL cannot afford that. Football stakeholders want clarity, not confusion. The DRC must provide it.